Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 460
Dale v. Healy
as 4:2024cv00692
Petitioner: Curtis Lee Dale
Respondent: Warden I. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hampton v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10769
Plaintiff: Curtis Lee Hampton and Curtis Lee Hampton, Jr.
Defendant: Heidi Washington, A. Douglas, Leslie Cummings and others
Rucker v. USA
as 5:2024cv00092
Petitioner: Curtis Lee Rucker, Jr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Elgin v. State of South Carolina
as 4:2024cv01319
Petitioner: Curtis L. Elgin and Curtis Lee Elgin
Respondent: State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v. USA
as 6:2024cv00099
Plaintiff: Curtis Lee Ellis
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ellis v. USA
as 3:2023cv02867
Petitioner: Curtis Lee Ellis
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ellis v. LNU
as 4:2023cv01156
Plaintiff: Curtis Lee Ellis
Defendant: Thea LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Still v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 8:2023cv04826
Plaintiff: Curtis Lee Still
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bias et al v. Skillet Catering Service We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00501
Plaintiff: Michael Spencer Bias, Daniel Hinson, Kenneth Peyton and others
Defendant: Skillet Catering Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. USA
as 3:2023cv00203
Petitioner: William Curtis Lee
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?