Cases 41 - 50 of 343
Alessio v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 3:2016cv02265
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Alessio
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Loudoun Centre v. REA & Derick, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01730
Plaintiff:
Loudoun Centre
Defendant:
REA & Derick, Inc. , CVS Caremark Corporation and CVS Corporation
Counterclaim_plaintiff:
CVS Caremark Corporation , REA & Derick, Inc. and CVS Corporation
Counterclaim_defendant:
Loudoun Centre
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv04395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Garza, Jr. v. CVS Caremark Corporation
as 2:2016cv00040
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation
Plaintiff:
Vidal Garza, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-11183
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kaufman v. CVS Caremark Corp., et al
as 16-1199
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONDA KAUFMAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
CVS CAREMARK CORPORATION and CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Sternfeld v. CVS RX Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00101
Defendant:
CVS Albany, LLC, CVS Caremark Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sternfeld
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv06602
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
