Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Cadel v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et. al.
as 2:2022cv00952
Plaintiff:
William A. Cadel
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Aetna Health Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Peterson v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2021cv04245
Plaintiff:
John Peterson
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Officer Norman Faulkcon, Officer Cadell Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CADELL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv00488
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff:
ANGELA CADELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lacy v. USA (DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE - All filings to be made in case no. 6:16-cr-10009-EFM-1)
as 6:2020cv01267
Petitioner:
Daederick Cadell Lacy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hill v. Pitts et al
as 1:2020cv01979
Defendant:
Shawn Ellen LaGrua, N. Faulkcon, Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique JaDon Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Guevara v. Corizon Health, et al
as 19-16373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT P. GUEVARA
Defendant / Appellee:
ITORO ELIJAH, Doctor, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Jane Doe # 1; Jane Doe # 2; Jane Doe # 3, member of committee, CHARLES L. RYAN and others
Rice v. USA
as 4:2018cv00264
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Samuel Cadel Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cadell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04154
Plaintiff:
Jessica Cadell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goodman v. Singleton et al
as 1:2017cv01029
Petitioner:
Brandon Cadell Goodman
Respondent:
Kenneth Singleton and Curtis Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Goodman v. Byrum
as 1:2017cv01082
Petitioner:
Brandon Cadell Goodman
Respondent:
Robert Byrum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
