Cases 1 - 9 of 9
FISCHER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
ALAN E. FISCHER and JOHN DOES 1-10,000
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, US CAPITOL POLICE DEPARTMENT, DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Harris v. Mississippi Department of Public Safety et al
as 3:2023cv03159
Plaintiff:
Sherita Harris
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Public Safety, Mississippi Capitol Police Department, Captain Michael Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Gonsalves v. State of Rhode Island, State Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv00346
Plaintiff:
Taja Gonsalves
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, State Police Department, State of Rhode Island Capitol Police Department, Neil Laird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 2:2015cv01588
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wayne Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, Navy Criminal Investigation Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hephzibah Bates v. Employees, VA Capitol Police
as 15-1655
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEPHZIBAH BATES
Defendant - Appellee:
EMPLOYEES, VIRGINIA CAPITOL POLICE DEPARTMENT
WHITE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2010cv01477
Plaintiff:
LEROY WHITE and THOMASINE WHITE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE, RICHARD ROE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
