Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Carl Turner v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 19-2709
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carl Stanley Turner
Defendant / Appellee:
Lindsey Moody, Parole Officer, Arkansas Department of Community Corrections, John Felts, Arkansas Parole Board, Matt Higgins, Police Officer Searcy Pl and others
Turner v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2019cv00496
Defendant:
Eric Fleming, Sheri J Flynn, Adam Sexton and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Stanley Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Turner v. Lenderman et al
as 5:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
Carl Stanley Turner
Defendant:
Diane Lenderman, Tammy Allen and W Straughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as AZ/2:17-cv-00102
Plaintiff:
Carl A Turner
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Turner v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Carl A Turner
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carl Turner v. Sheri Flynn
as 16-1569
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carl Stanley Turner
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheri Flynn, Supervisor, Sex Offender Assessment Committee
Carl Turner v. Sheri Flynn
as 15-2868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carl Stanley Turner
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheri Flynn, Supervisor, Sex Offender Assessment Committee
Turner v. Flynn
as 5:2015cv00167
Plaintiff:
Carl Stanley Turner
Defendant:
Sheri J Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carl Turner v. Ray Hobbs, et al
as 14-1410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carl Stanley Turner
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Danny Burl, Warden, E.A.R.U., Arkansas Department of Correction, Todd Ball, Assistant Warden, E.A.R.U., Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
