Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bennett v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv15343
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Bennett
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv05723
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN BENNETT
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC , Johnson & Johnson Customer Logistics Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as ILN/1:17-cv-03057
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Bennett
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Customer Logistics Services, LLC and others
Bennett v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv03057
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Bennett
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Customer Logistics Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper v. Academy of Training School, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01266
Defendant:
Academy of Training School L L C and Progressive Buildings L L C
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Bennett Harper
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Bennett et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as INN/3:13-cv-00658
Plaintiff:
William F Bennett and Carolyn Bennett
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Bennett et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00658
Plaintiff:
William F Bennett and Carolyn Bennett
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2012cv00456
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, James Banks, Curtis Meinzer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Dahmen et al v. McNeil-PPC Inc et al
as 2:2012cv10371
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Bennett, Ernest Comesana, James Dahmen and others
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Does, Johnson and Johnson Inc and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
