Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
International Leadership of Texas Inc v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2021cv02618
Plaintiff:
International Leadership of Texas Inc
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Chad West, Jesse Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jim's Car Wash et al v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2021cv01746
Plaintiff:
Jim's Car Wash, Freddy Davenport and Dale Davenport
Defendant:
City of Dallas, Chad West, Adam Medrano and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Acosta et al v. Rock N Roll Coal Co. Inc.
as 1:2019cv00242
Plaintiff:
Carolyn King and R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Rock N Roll Coal Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Rawlings et al
as 3:2019cv00180
Defendant:
Mark Clayton, Kevin Felder, Tennell Atkins and others
Plaintiff:
Warren Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King et al v. Vial Fotheringham LLP
as 6:2018cv02203
Plaintiff:
Carolyn King and Edgar King
Defendant:
Vial Fotheringham LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Meyers v. Hughes et al
as 2:2018cv04399
Defendant:
Hon Matthew G. Hughes, Ademola Kolawak, Gary Rosenthal and others
Plaintiff:
Arlene Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Meyers v. Hughes et al
as 1:2018cv06737
Defendant:
Hon Matthew G. Hughes, Ademola Kolawak, Gary Rosenthal and others
Plaintiff:
Arlene Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KING v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00356
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN KING
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez et al v. Mayhorn
as 2:2016cv04697
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez and Carolyn King
Defendant:
Jimmy Mayhorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 901
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
