Cases 21 - 30 of 36,510
Henderson v. Berryhill
as 19-232
Defendant / Appellee:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Delores L. Henderson
Buchanan v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00030
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin and Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Karen Buchanan and Karen Renee Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson, ex. rel. K.R., a minor v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv08541
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Dominique Johnson, ex. rel. K.R., a minor and Dominique Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
PETERS v. COLVIN
as 2:2015cv04750
Plaintiff:
TERESA PETERS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Reaves v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv01075
Defendant:
Colvin
Plaintiff:
Reaves and Oburla Reaves
Respondent:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Fairbairn v. Colvin
as 1:2019cv00029
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Holly J. Fairbairn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Jefferson v. Mack
as 1:2018cv00288
Defendant:
Ashley Mack and Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Elmer Lee Jefferson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grant v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00065
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Nancy A. Berryhill and Caroline W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Grant and Tracey Lee Grant
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sherrod v. Cooper et al
as 5:2018ct03322
Defendant:
Elaine Marshall, Janet L. Yellen, Wake Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Marion L. Sherrod
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlson v. Colvin et al
as 0:2018cv03217
Defendant:
Linda S Momahon and Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
David R Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
