Cases 21 - 30 of 456
Nissan North America, Inc. v. Woodfield Nissan, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00716
Plaintiff:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Defendant:
Woodfield Nissan, Inc. and Roy Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Fraud
Carr v. Google Inc., a Delaware Corporation
as 1:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
RaSaon Carr
Defendant:
Google Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carr v. Meta Platform, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00322
Defendant:
Meta Platform, Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Camridge Analytica (SLC)
Plaintiff:
RaSaon Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Carr v. OneTouchPoint, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
RaSaon Carr
Defendant:
OneTouchPoint, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lopez v. City of Wyandotte, City of, et al
as 2:2023cv11059
Plaintiff:
ANGEL LOPEZ
Defendant:
City of Wyandotte, Detecitve Joseph Carr, Officer AARON WORLEY and others
Myles #439074 v. Carr et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
Kennith Myles #439074
Defendant:
Unknown Carr, Unknown Miller, Matt Macauley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron et al v. The Medical Protective Company Inc., et al
as 1:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Frieda Aaron, James Albers, Jimmy Allen and others
Defendant:
Administratrix Ashisha Wallace, The Medical Protective Company Inc., MedPro Group Inc., f/k/a Medical Protective Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Daniel CarrIn re: Daniel Carr
as 23-1359
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL CARR
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Travis Carr v. FCA US, LLC
as 23-3290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS PRESTON CARR
Defendant / Appellee:
FCA US, LLC
Smith v. Elpaso County Mail Employees et al
as 3:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
Elpaso County Mail Employees, f/n/u Carr, f/nu McCalister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
