Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Plumb v. Bates County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2016cv00834
Plaintiff:
Mark Dwayne Plumb
Defendant:
Chad Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummings v. Bates County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2016cv00485
Plaintiff:
Michael Cummings
Defendant:
Bates County Sheriff's Department, Chad Anderson, Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patrick Celestine, et al v. Eagle US 2, L.L.C.
as 15-90089
Plaintiff - Respondent:
PATRICK CELESTINE, on behalf of his minor child KC (2), DONOVAN CLOPHUS, on behalf of his minor child DC, Jr., JARED CRADEUR, on behalf of his minor child KC (1) and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
EAGLE US 2, L.L.C.
Celestine et al v. Eagle U S 2 L L C et al
as 2:2015cv00679
Plaintiff:
Patrick Celestine , Donovan Clophus , Jared Cradeur and others
Defendant:
Eagle U S 2 L L C and David L Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heckadon et al v. Leer et al
as 4:2014cv01010
Plaintiff:
Justin L. Heckadon and Kessie Dawn Heckadon
Defendant:
Clinton Leer , Rich Hill, Missouri , Jeremy Chiles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Anderson et al
as 4:2014cv00567
Plaintiff:
Wanda Jones
Defendant:
Chad Anderson, Cory Davis and David Rowton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crews v. Anderson et al
as 4:2014cv00591
Plaintiff:
Jimmy J Crews
Defendant:
Chad Anderson, Caleb Jeter, Paul V. Mangano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Cain et al
as 3:2014cv00341
Petitioner:
Chad Anderson
Respondent:
N. Burl Cain and James Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Willard v. Anderson
as 4:2013cv00196
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Willard
Defendant:
Chad Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willard v. Anderson et al
as 4:2013cv00197
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Willard
Defendant:
Chad Anderson and Bates County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
