Cases 1 - 10 of 10
EL v. BLACK
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
RYSHEID MALIK EL
Defendant:
Corrections Officer CHAD BLACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOLTIE v. COUNTY OF GREENSBURG et al
as 2:2021cv00267
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER DEMOREST, STEVEN M. PELESKY, JEFFERY LONG and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOSEPH STOLTIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
NELSON v. LOWTHER et al
as 2:2021cv00114
Defendant:
PAUL DEPALM, GEORGE LOWTHER, BENJAMIN C. SHAFFER and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HOSKINS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03182
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SONNIER, AARON MOSDAL, CHRISTOPHER LAWRENCE and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hoskins et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02145
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sonnier, Aaron Mosdal, Christopher Lawrence and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
USA Regrowth LLC et al v. Midas Investments LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00024
Defendant:
Chad Black and Midas Investments LLC
Plaintiff:
USA Regrowth LLC, JLO Investments LLC, Myrtle Hill LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMARR v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2017cv01637
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH SMARR
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY, WEXFORD HEALTH RESOURCES, INC, JOHN R. WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Comer v. Reid et al
as 5:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Cynthia H. Comer
Defendant:
James Coy Reid , Bob Riley , Mark William Shook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Black v. South Carolina Department of Correction
as 3:2011cv02841
Plaintiff:
Chad Black
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Correction and Willie L Eagleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillo v. Bailey et al
as 2:2007cv00882
Plaintiff:
Castillo Castillo and Castillo Castillo
Defendant:
Jeff Bailey, Kirk Denning, Chad Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
