Cases 1 - 10 of 145
Chams v. Sibcy Cline, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
James Chams
Defendant:
Sibcy Cline, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Harvest Small Business Finance et al v. Evan Mitnick et al
as 8:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Harvest Small Business Finance, LLC and Harvest Commercial Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Evan Mitnick, Michelle Chamness, Michael Sanchez and others
Chamness v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
John Chamness
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv03454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cham v. United States of America
as 23-1314
Petitioner:
DANIE CHAM
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CHAM BANK S.A. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL et al.
as 1:2023cv01212
Plaintiff:
CHAM BANK S.A.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control, Director of OFAC ANDREA M. GACKI and ANDREA M. GACKI
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Chamness v. Centurion et al
as 4:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
William Ray Chamness
Defendant:
Centurion of Missouri, Laura Manford, Shanta Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chamness v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04644
Plaintiff:
Michele N. Chamness
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
