Cases 1 - 10 of 22
v. Naturalization Ceremony 04/23/2024
as 3:2024mc80088
Not Yet Classified:
Adriana Denisse Aguirre, Ali Marzoughi, Jonathan Galvez and others
Palani KarupaiyanIn re: Palani Karupaiyan
as 23-3044
Petitioner:
In re: PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Plaintiff:
P. P. and R. P.
Respondent:
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES, (TCS), RAJESH GOPINATHAN, individually and in his official capacity as MD, CEP of the TCS, TATA GROUP OF COMPANIES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SUBRAMANIAN RAMADORAI, individually and in his official capacity, ex CEO/MD of the TCS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Phadnis v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv06500
Plaintiff:
Pankaj Kumudchandra Phadnis
Defendant:
Damian Williams, Ratan Tata, Natarajan Chandrasekaran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
PALEMPALLI v. PATSALOS-FOX et al
as 2:2021cv12025
Plaintiff:
VISWANATHA PALEMPALLI
Defendant:
GORDON J. COBURN, LEO S. MACKAY, JR., ROBERT E. WEISSMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv13247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
