Cases 1 - 10 of 699
JOHNSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
CHANTEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Steven L. Harris v. Chantell Jewell
as 24-1999
Petitioner:
STEVEN L. HARRIS
Respondent:
CHANTELL JEWELL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Otero v. Haftopulos et al
as 4:2024cv02147
Plaintiff:
Chantel Otero
Defendant:
Christopher Allen Haftopulos and B R Williams Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Wycoff v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Wycoff
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jeff Barteff, Mike Heinricy and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chantele Foster, et al v. Kevin Emberg
as 24-11754
Plaintiff:
CHANTELE FOSTER and JEREMY FOSTER
Defendant:
KEVIN EMBERG
Robinson v. Brown & Brown of Florida, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00703
Defendant:
Brown & Brown of Florida, Inc. and Brown & Brown of Ohio, LLC
Plaintiff:
Chantel Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
Brown v. Hospira
as 24-30325
Plaintiff:
Ada Brown, Chantel Brown, Gwen Burnstein and others
Defendant:
Hospira Worldwide, L.L.C., formerly known as Hospira Worldwide, Incorporated, Sandoz, Incorporated, Accord Healthcare, Incorporated and others
Simmons v. Genesee, County of et al
as 4:2024cv10815
Defendant:
YesCare Corp, CHS TX, Inc, Genesee, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Kristen Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker-Whitlow v. Meharry Medical College
as 3:2024cv00609
Plaintiff:
Chantel Baker-Whitlow
Defendant:
Meharry Medical College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
