Cases 41 - 50 of 107
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Clapp v. Baker et al
as 1:2018cv10426
Plaintiff:
Kevin S. Clapp
Defendant:
Charles Baker, Michael W. Morrissey, Richard McKeon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BAKER et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2017cv00790
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MAXINE BAKER and CHARLES BAKER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bangston v. Charles Baker Trucking, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv03007
Plaintiff:
Troy Bangston
Defendant:
Charles Baker Trucking, LLC and Charles Baker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Baker v. Jensen et al
as 2:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Charles Baker
Defendant:
Darren Jay Jensen, Mark R. Jaggi, Michael A. Beindorff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Malden Transportation, Inc. et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv12538
Plaintiff:
Malden Transportation, Inc. , PEGM Transportation, LLC , Medford Trans., Inc. and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Governor Charles Baker and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Estep v. Baker et al
as 1:2016cv12346
Plaintiff:
Thomas Estep
Defendant:
Charles Baker, Daniel Bennett and Massachusetts Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mino v. Alicea et al
as 4:2016cv40160
Plaintiff:
Timothy Mino
Defendant:
Geraldo Alicea, James Lemire, Charles Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Baker v. Debbie Asuncion
as 2:2016cv07697
Respondent:
Debbie Asuncion
Petitioner:
Charles Baker
Boston Taxi Owners Association, Inc. et al v. Governor Charles Baker et al
as 1:2016cv11922
Plaintiff:
Boston Taxi Owners Association, Inc. and Steven Goldberg
Defendant:
Charles Baker , Angela M. O'Connor , Jolette A. Westbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
