Cases 11 - 20 of 29
D.S. v. Dunn et al
as 2:2020cv02012
Defendant:
Allen Knott, Terry, Gwendolyn Givens and others
Plaintiff:
David Smith and D. S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers v. Godecki et al
as 2:2020cv01401
Defendant:
Tara Carpenter, Pamela Del Porto, Barbara Cegavske and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Wayne Vickers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Edmisten v. Daniels et al
as 3:2020cv00230
Defendant:
Melina Castro, David Drummond, Donald Southworth and others
Plaintiff:
Justin James Edmisten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lancaster v. Adcock et al
as 4:2019cv00144
Defendant:
Stark Ligon, Edward G Adcock and Charles Daniel Hancock
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05417
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Kemit et al
as 6:2017cv00287
Defendant:
All Unnamed Agents of the IRS Department of the Treasury, Matthew Crouse, Charles Daniels, III and others
Plaintiff:
Shermin Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
New Doe Child #1, et al v. United States of America, et al
as 16-4440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
New Doe Child #1, New Doe Child #2, New Doe Child #3 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
The United States of America, Jacob J. Lew, Secretary of the Treasury, Rhett Jeppson, Principal Deputy Director, United States Mint and others
Taylor v. Mastrodomenica et al
as 5:2015cv02160
Plaintiff:
Patrick Taylor
Defendant:
Adam Mastrodomenica, Charles Daniels, Edric Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
