Cases 21 - 30 of 32
United States v. Charles Walker
as 12-1391
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Charles E. Walker
Walker v. NH Administrative Office of the Courts, et al
as 1:2011cv00421
Defendant:
NH Administrative Office of the Courts and NH Circuit Court, 2nd Circuit, District Division-Littleton
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Becker et al v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 120 et al
as 0:2011cv00142
Plaintiff:
Mark R. Becker , Richard G. Adams , Liphrino Alcenat and others
Defendant:
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 120 and U.S. Foodservice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Charles Walker v. Ken Clark
as 10-55805
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES E. WALKER
Respondent - Appellee:
KEN CLARK, Warden
Charles E. Walker v. John Dovey
as 2:2008cv05587
Respondent:
Warden Ken Clark and John Dovey
Petitioner:
Charles E. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Astrue
as 2:2008cv00287
Plaintiff:
Charles E Walker
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
DO NOT DOCKET in 2:08mc70. DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE FILED IN RELATED CIVIL CASE #2:08cv287. Walker v. Social Security
as 2:2008mc00070
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Walker
Defendant:
Social Security
Walker v. Karles
as 2:2007cv02545
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Walker
Defendant:
Karles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newby v. Enron Corp, et al
as 07-20277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLEMING & ASSOCIATES LLP
Defendant - Appellee:
NEWBY & TITTLE DEFENDANTS, represented by Liaison Counsel, ROBERT A BELFER, NORMAN P BLAKE, JR. and others
Newby v. Enron Corp, et al
as 07-20043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FLEMING & ASSOCIATES LLP
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW S FASTOW, BANK OF AMERICA CORP, CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
