Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Nylander et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00397
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bruce Nylander, John Merrill Adams, JR, Russell Eugene Ahlberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Nylander et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Robert Bruce Nylander, John Merrill Adams, JR, Russell Eugene Ahlberg and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Davis v. Brien
as 2:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Davis, III
Defendant:
Shannon Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis II v. Kennedy
as 1:2018cv25324
Defendant:
Alexa S. Kennedy
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Davis II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv01472
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Charles Davis
as 16-5734
Movant:
In re: CHARLES EDWARD DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Davis v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2014cv80429
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Davis, II
Defendant:
Ric Bradshaw, Jones and Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Haggerty v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2012cv04562
Defendant:
Bernice Abram, Bernice Abram, Lakeisha Andrews and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Haggerty
Davis v. Winschel et al
as 2:2011cv00190
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Davis
Defendant:
Donald Winschel, Kelle Wallace, David Basse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Davis, II
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, FNU Riley, Michael Craven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
