Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Arpino v. Flynn et al
as 3:2022cv01550
Plaintiff:
Holly H. Arpino
Defendant:
Charles Flynn, Stephen Perry and Christopher Adkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flynn v. Browning et al
as 3:2021cv03253
Plaintiff:
Charles Flynn
Defendant:
. Browning, . Powell, . Dodds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flynn v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv01664
Plaintiff:
Charles Flynn
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FLYNN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv16360
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. ( F/K/A JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC.) and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
CHARLES FLYNN and GEORGIANA FLYNN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Doe v. Brandeis University et al
as 1:2019cv11049
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Brandeis University, Daniel Storms and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nationwide Insurance Company of America v. Marin Mortgage Bankers Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv01255
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Marin Mortgage Bankers Corporation, Flynn/MMB Mortgage Fund LLC, MMB First Mortgage Fund, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bartels v. The Incorporated Village of Lloyd Harbor et al
as 2:2010cv05076
Defendant:
Police Officer Baffa, Sergeant Renald Difonzo, John Does 1 and 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bartels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bartels v. The Incorporated Village of Ll
as 10-4387
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jeffrey Bartels
Defendant:
The Incorporated Village of Lloyd Harbor
Defendant - Appellant:
Leland M. Hairr, individually, George M. McCabe, Jean Thatcher and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
