Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Lloyd v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 8:2020cv00903
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
John Charles Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LINDELL v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01640
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LLOYD LINDELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melina Abdullah v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv01329
Defendant:
Jason Curtis, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Charles Lloyd Beck and others
Plaintiff:
Melina Abdullah and Dr. Melina Abdullah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lloyd v. Compass Group USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv10757
Defendant:
Compass Group USA, Inc., Bateman Community Living, LLC and Elior, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lloyd v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04295
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
John Charles Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arogant Hollywood, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 17-55869
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AROGANT HOLLYWOOD and ALISON HELEN FAIRCHILD
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHARLES LLOYD BECK, Chief of LAPD and others
Arogant Hollywood et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2017cv02449
Defendant:
Chief of LAPD Charles Lloyd Beck, City of Los Angeles, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Alison Helen Fairchild and Arogant Hollywood
Charles Patterson, Sr. v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-3018
Petitioner:
Charles Lloyd Patterson, Sr.
Respondent:
Wendy Kelley
Charles Patterson, Sr. v. Wendy Kelley
as 16-1409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Lloyd Patterson, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections
Charles Patterson, Sr. v. State of Arkansas, et al
as 16-1184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Lloyd Patterson, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Arkansas and Arkansas Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
