Cases 1 - 10 of 15
USA v. Lester Stokes
as 23-1945
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LESTER CHARLES STOKES, aka Jay Lester-Charles Stokes
Kiya Cunningham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 23-1978
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIYA CUNNINGHAM
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., NADINE MOONEY, JENNIFER S. JOHNSON, a/k/a Jennifer Peach and others
Cunningham v. Wells Fargo N.A. et al
as 3:2022cv00094
Defendant:
Jennifer S. Johnson, Wells Fargo N.A., Nadine Mooney and others
Plaintiff:
Kiya Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
STOKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv91141
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES STOKES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cunningham v. Wells Fargo N.A et al
as 3:2019cv00528
Defendant:
Nadine Mooney, David McDowell, Charles Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
Kiya Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Stokes v. Stirling et al
as 9:2019cv02283
Defendant:
Jones, Nance, Michael McCall and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Raymond Stoke
as 18-50289
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAYMOND CHARLES STOKES, also known as Raymond Storkes, also known as Ray C. Stokes, also known as Raymond Stokes, also known as Raymond C. Stokes
Holcomb v. Dufresne Spencer Group, LLC (TV1)
as 1:2018cv00047
Defendant:
Dufresne Spencer Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Holcomb , Roger Toby Ledford , Charles Stokes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Charles Stokes v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2016cv10621
Plaintiff:
Charles Stokes
Defendant:
City of Chicago, P.O. Ewing and P.O. Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
