Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,685
Clemons v. McSlone (#118) et al
as 6:2024cv06061
Plaintiff: Ovell Daniel Clemons, Jr.
Defendant: Officer McSlone (#118), Officer Ramirez (#171), Officer Gibson (#105) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAN et al v. LO et al
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff: CHI HUI TAN and KUNG TUAN TAN
Defendant: VICTOR K S LO and EVER SPRING CO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
US v. Chi-Ali Bunn
as 24-4216
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CHI-ALI ALIJUWON BUNN
Ngo v. Romero, et al.
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff: Chi Thanh Ngo
Defendant: Manuel Romero, Rey Medeles, Gustavo Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Quang Chi Luong v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv03168
Petitioner: Quang Chi Luong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv02907
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Dial v. Dichter et al
as 1:2024cv02648
Plaintiff: Keith Dial
Defendant: Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02477
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Vietti v. Welsh & McGough, et al
as 24-5032
Plaintiff: MARIA DEL ROSARIO CHI VIETTI, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of A.R.V., P.F.V. and H.S.V., minor children
Defendant: WELSH & MCGOUGH, PLLC, an Oklahoma Professional Limited Liability Corporation, CATHERINE Z. WELSH, an individual and JAIME VOGT, LPC, an individual
Clemons v. Jones (#126) et al
as 6:2024cv06026
Plaintiff: Ovell Daniel Clemons, Jr.
Defendant: Officer Jones (#126), Officer Smith (#153), Officer McSlone (#118) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?