Cases 1 - 10 of 817
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03598
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 cn Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Dawson v. Sargus et al
as 2:2024cv02175
Plaintiff:
William T. Dawson, Jr.
Defendant:
Judge Edmund A Sargus, Jr, Christin Werner, Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MARCHISOTTO v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv05870
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Wier et al
as 7:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Terrance Brown
Defendant:
Judge Robert Wier, Chief Judge Danny Reeves and Senior Judge Joseph Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
El v. Chun
as 24-1142
Defendant:
BLAIR, JOSEPH FUCITO, Sergeant PETER LITRA, Shield #1197 and others
Plaintiff:
SAGE EL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Russell Lindquist v. Vicki Taylor, et al
as 24-1876
Plaintiff:
Russell Floyd Lindquist
Defendant:
Vicki Taylor, individually and officially as Assistant Chief Judge in Dakota County (DC), First Judicial District, Keith M. Ellison, officially as Minnesota Attorney General, Matt Smith, officially as DC Manager and others
Terrance Brown v. Robert Wier, et al
as 24-5386
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE BROWN
Defendant:
JUDGE ROBERT E. WIER, CHIEF JUDGE DANNY C. REEVES and SENIOR JUDGE JOSEPH M. HOOD
Jermaine Carter v. Colm Connolly, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE L. CARTER
Defendant:
CHIEF JUDGE COLM F. CONNOLLY and COLLINS J. SEITZ
Augustin, Maxime v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2024cv14105
Plaintiff:
Maxime Augustin
Defendant:
State of Florida, Ex Rel Mental Health and Chief Judge Schwab
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
