Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MULLIS v. LANE
as 1:2023cv01516
Petitioner:
BRENT DEWAYNE MULLIS
Respondent:
CHRIS LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GOLDEN-FIELDS v. LANE et al
as 1:2023cv01382
Plaintiff:
NICKI GOLDEN-FIELDS
Defendant:
CHRIS LANE and DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yaquelin Ordonez v. Warren Stanley, et al
as 23-55540
Plaintiff / Appellee:
YAQUELIN SEVASTIANA ORDONEZ, an individual
Defendant / Appellant:
WARREN A. STANLEY, individual capacity, CHARLES SAMPSON, Sr., individual capacity, A. BRAAKSMA, Sgt. (No. 16551), individual capacity and others
Brent Mullis v. Chris Lane
as 23-1946
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRENT D. MULLIS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRIS LANE, Sheriff, Bartholomew County, Indiana
COMBS v. LANE
as 1:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
DEAN COMBS
Defendant:
CHRIS LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Laddner et al
as 3:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Rickey Brown
Defendant:
Cody Laddner, Taylor Igleheart, Jason Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibbs v. Lane et al
as 3:2021cv00123
Defendant:
Aaron Morphis, Chris Lane and Brian C Smith
Plaintiff:
Alvis Lee Gibbs, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv23507
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wardingly v. Inch et al
as 2:2020cv00323
Plaintiff:
Edward Wardingly
Defendant:
FNU McCain, Mark Inch, FNU Holm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MI Dept of Environ. Quality, et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 19-1318
Appellant:
KIMBERLY PALMER, BRUCE TENNISWOOD, CHERYL GROVES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
