Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DAVIDSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv95691
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER STEVEN DAVIDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daker v. Deal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv05243
Defendant: Georgia Department of Corrections, Cobb County Superior Court, Christopher Michael Carr and others
Plaintiff: Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Davidson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2015cv00138
Plaintiff: Carlos . Ramirez
Defendant: Christopher D Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Deal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv03856
Plaintiff: Waseem Daker
Defendant: Nathan Deal, Brian Kemp, Samuel Olens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon Kittle-Aikeley, et al v. Donald Claycomb, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1145
Plaintiff - Appellee: Brandon Kittle-Aikeley, Michael Barrett, IV, Jacob Curliss and others
Defendant - Appellant: Donald M. Claycomb, in his official capacity as President of the Linn State Technical College Board of Regents, Toni R. Schwartz, in her official capacity as member of the Linn State Technical College Board of Regents, John Klebba, in his official capacity as member of Linn State Technical College Board of Regents and others
Defendant: Christopher T. Davidson and Member, Linn State Technical College Board of Regents
Brandon Kittle-Aikeley, et al v. Donald Claycomb, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-3264
Plaintiff - Appellee: Brandon Kittle-Aikeley, Michael Barrett, IV, Jacob Curliss and others
Defendant - Appellant: Donald M. Claycomb, in his official capacity as President of the Linn State Technical College Board of Regents, Toni R. Schwartz, in her official capacity as member of the Linn State Technical College Board of Regents, John Klebba, in his official capacity as member of Linn State Technical College Board of Regents and others
Defendant: Christopher T. Davidson, J. Scott Christian, in his official capacity as a member of the Board of Regents for Linn State Technical College and Member, Linn State Technical College Board of Regents
Michael Barrett, IV, et al v. Donald Claycomb, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1001
Plaintiff - Appellee: Michael Barrett, IV, Brandon Kittle-Aikeley, Jacob Curliss and others
Defendant - Appellant: Donald M. Claycomb, in his official capacity as President of the Linn State Technical College Board of Regents, Toni R. Schwartz, in her official capacity as member of the Linn State Technical College Board of Regents, John Klebba, in his official capacity as member of Linn State Technical College Board of Regents and others
Barrett et al v. Claycomb et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv04242
Plaintiff: Branden Kittle-Aikeley , Michael Barrett, IV , Jacob Curliss and others
Defendant: Donald M. Claycomb , Toni R. Schwartz , John Klebba and others
Interested_party: Students for Sensible Drug Policy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv06284
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Christopher A. Davidson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
United States of America et al v. Land in Putnam County, Tennessee, an Easement and Right-of-Way over 1.99 Acres et al
as 2:2008cv00042
Plaintiff: United States of America, United States of America, Tennessee Valley Authority and others
Defendant: Land in Putnam County, Tennessee, an Easement and Right-of-Way over 1.99 Acres, Robert Kendrick Davidson, Johnna Lynn Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Real Property None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?