Cases 1 - 10 of 21
WILLIAMS v. WILDER et al
as 1:2020cv02673
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEROY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BARTHOLOMEW, BRIAN WILDER, CHRISTOPHER W. CLAPP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. FedEx et al
as 1:2020cv08190
Defendant:
FedEx and Federal Express Corporation
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ambrose Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Norrid et al v. D.A.R.P., et al.,
as 5:2018cv05110
Plaintiff:
Shane Norrid , Kermit Michael Troxel , Kevin Hartman and others
Defendant:
Darp, Inc. , Raymond Jones and Hendren Plastics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595
Norrid et al v. D.A.R.P., et al.,
as 5:2018cv05110
Plaintiff:
Shane Norrid , Kermit Michael Troxel , Kevin Hartman and others
Defendant:
Darp, Inc. , Raymond Jones and Hendren Plastics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595
Norrid et al v. Troxel et al
as 6:2017cv00401
Plaintiff:
Shane Norrid , Kermit Michael Troxel , Kevin Hartman and others
Defendant:
D.A.R.P., Inc., , Raymond Jones , Hendren Plastics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv09980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
alaniz et al v. schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2015at00577
Plaintiff:
andrew alaniz , alfred allen , pasqual aparicio and others
Defendant:
arnold schwarzenegger, jeffrey beard, paul brazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ines v. Home Street Bank et al
as 1:2014cv00542
Plaintiff:
Tom Ines
Defendant:
Home Street Bank, Lina Hwang, Ryan Cooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
