Cases 1 - 10 of 100
T.E.N. Investments, Inc. v. Chapter Jackson, et al
as 26-3143
Plaintiff:
T.E.N. INVESTMENTS, INC., DBA Aristocrat Motors
Defendant:
CHAPTER KRIS JACKSON, ARISTOCRAT MOTOR COMPANY, INC., SNOWY OWL LLC and others
United States of America v. Canada (Coley)
as 26-1380
Defendant:
RODNEY CANADA, TERRELL WILLS, RAMION BAKER and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ray v. Harris County Jail
as 4:2026cv02621
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Ray
Defendant:
Harris County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Adams v. USA
as 2:2026cv00003
Petitioner:
Sean Christopher Adams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Douglas Symmes, Jr. v. Scotland Correctional Institution
as 26-6091
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
SCOTLAND CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, NC Dept of Adult Corrections Sued Individual and Official Capacity, TODD E. ISHEE, Secretary of Prisons Sued Individual and Official Capacity, BRANDESHAWN HARRIS, Chief Deputy Secretary Sued Individual and Official Capacity and others
United States of America v. Canada
as 25-3199
Defendant:
TERRELL WILLS, RAMION BAKER, RODNEY CANADA and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Aaron et al v Valve Corporation
as 2:2025cv02657
Petitioner:
Hamza Abdullah, Alexander Abelar, Jackson Abney and others
Respondent:
Valve Corporation
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Ray v. Officer Mitchell et al
as 4:2025cv05242
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Ray
Defendant:
Officer Mitchell and Officer Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. John Doe/Jane
as 1:2025cv12119
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
John Doe/Jane, Noble and John Doe Mr. Moble
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
