Cases 51 - 60 of 86
Clark v. Pizza Baker, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00157
Plaintiff:
Ronald Clark
Defendant:
Pizza Baker, Inc. , Precision Pizza LLC , Domino's Pizza, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Michelle Resnick, et al v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc., et al
as 17-56434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHELLE RESNICK, SHELBY CRAMER, LAUREN FREED and others
Defendant - Appellee:
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INC. and HYUNDAI MOTOR CO., LTD.
Pape v. Stamford et al
as 3:2017cv00863
Defendant:
City of Stamford , Christopher Baker and Steven Perrotta
Plaintiff:
Richard G. Pape
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00837
Defendant:
Kenneth Arceneuax, Christopher Baker, Beth Lafleur and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HEINRICH et al v. MCCORKLE et al
as 1:2016cv03026
Defendant:
BRUCE BAKER, RICHARD BOUSLOG, KIM CRONK and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BAKER, HANNAH HEINRICH, JAMES KENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. Postma et al
as 0:2016cv60776
Plaintiff:
Christopher Baker
Defendant:
Randy Postma, Postma & Vom Broich International and Cary, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michelle Resnick et al v. Hyundai Motor America, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv00593
Plaintiff:
Michelle Resnick, Carmen Ozdemir, Scott Schieber and others
Defendant:
Hyundai Motor America, Inc, Hyundai motor Manufacturing Alabama LLC, KIA Motors manufacturing Georgia, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker v. Lester
as 3:2016cv00017
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BAKER
Defendant:
LESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Lester
as 1:2015cv04092
Plaintiff:
Christopher Baker
Defendant:
Lester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tibbs v. Power Only LLC et al
as 8:2015cv02492
Plaintiff:
James Tibbs
Defendant:
Power Only LLC and Christopher Baker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
