Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BOOTH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51926
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BOOTH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayriye Gok v. Post & Schell PC, et al
as 21-1898
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICK J. GRIFFIN, POST & SCHELL PC, DEREK SMITH and others
Defendant:
COUNSEL PRESS, CATHY MIKUS, JOSHUA S. BOYETTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAYRIYE BERIL GOK
GOK v. POST & SCHELL PC et al
as 2:2020cv04968
Defendant:
JUSTIN SWIDLER, DEREK SMITH LAW GROUP, PLLC, MATTHEW WEISBERG and others
Plaintiff:
HAYRIYE BERIL GOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Booth v. Commissioner of Correction et al
as 3:2019cv00100
Defendant:
Murphy, Warden, Thibeault and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Booth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. NH, State of et al
as 1:2017cv00170
Plaintiff:
Christopher Booth
Defendant:
NH, State of and Colin Van Ostern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Booth v. Cruz
as 1:2015cv00518
Plaintiff:
Christopher Booth
Defendant:
Ted Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Christopher Booth
as 15-60741
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BOOTH, also known as Chris
Casto v. Plaisance et al
as 2:2015cv00817
Plaintiff:
Cody L Casto
Defendant:
Donald Plaisance, Christopher Booth, Pamela Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv01248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Free et al v. Stewart Park Homes, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07916
Defendant:
Stewart Park Homes, Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Free, Terry Free, Terry Free and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
