Cases 1 - 10 of 27
DeQuincy Smith v. Ahmari Caffey, et al
as 23-3322
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DeQuincy Smith
Defendant / Appellee:
Ahmari Caffey, Sergeant, Maximum Security Unit, ADC, Head, Field Captain, Maximum Security Unit, ADC, Maurice Culclager, Deputy Warden, Maximum Security Unit, ADC and others
Grant v. The City of Fort Worth Police Department
as 4:2022cv00679
Plaintiff:
Cameron Christopher Grant
Defendant:
The City of Fort Worth Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Caffey et al
as 4:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
DeQuincy Smith
Defendant:
Ahmari Caffey, Head, Maurice Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRANT v. STRADA SERVICES INC et al
as 3:2021cv00859
Defendant:
STRADA SERVICES INC. d/b/a STRADA ELECTRIC AND SECURITY, JOSEPH STRADA and STRADA SERVICES INC doing business as STRADA ELECTRIC AND SECURITY
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GRANT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06286
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
GRANT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv57793
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GRANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OLDHAM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv42631
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER GRANT OLDHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Christopher Watson
as 19-1892
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Grant Watson
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
BRENNER v. HOOKS
as 1:2018cv00662
Respondent:
ERIC A. HOOKS and ERIK A. HOOKS
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER GRANT BRENNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRENNER v. HOOKS
as 1:2017cv00990
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER GRANT BRENNER
Respondent:
ERIC A. HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
