Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2024cv81547
Petitioner:
Gary Christopher Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Abello et al
as 1:2023cv03544
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
Frederick Abello, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Johnson v. NC DPS Prisons
as 23-6385
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
NC DPS PRISONS
Marcus Thorpe v. Derrick Copeland
as 23-6333
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS A. THORPE
Defendant / Appellee:
DERRICK COPELAND, f/k/a John Does 1-5, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, f/k/a John Does 1-5 and others
Defendant:
ANITA GOWANS, f/k/a A. Gowans, Nurse, Alexander CI, JOHN DOES, Correctional Officers 1-5, JOHN DOE, Medical Doctor and others
Johnson v. NC DPS Prisons
as 5:2021hc02084
Petitioner:
Christopher Johnson
Respondent:
NC DPS Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Parkersburg Police Dept. et al
as 2:2019cv00342
Defendant:
Parkersburg Police Dept., J.M. Stalnaker, Lt. William G. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Christopher Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Parkersburg Police Dept. et al
as 5:2019cv00160
Defendant:
Parkersburg Police Dept., J.M. Stalnaker, Lt. William G. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Christopher Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Parkersburg Police Department et al
as 1:2019cv00071
Defendant:
Sergeant J. M. Stalnaker, Detective T. P. Wolfe, Lt. William G. Collins and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Christopher Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. USA
as 5:2017cv00185
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Leonard Christopher Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOHNSON v. DANCE et al
as 1:2011cv00964
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON
Defendant:
DANCE, BROTHERS, VAUGHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
