Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ray v. Ford Motor Company
as 5:2025cv07388
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Christopher Samuel Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
US v. Martinez Lara
as 24-1991
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER SAMUEL MARTINEZ LARA, a/k/a Cristopher Samuel Martinez Lara
Samuels v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Brevard County)
as 6:2024cv01526
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Christopher Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Samuel v. Eve Aron
as 2:2023cv07728
Plaintiff:
Christopher Samuel
Defendant:
Eve Aron
Not Classified By Court:
James E Shelton
Christopher Samuel v. Eve Aron
as 2:2023mc00109
Defendant:
Eve Aron
Not Classified By Court:
James E Shelton
Plaintiff:
Christopher Samuel
JOYNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03281
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SAMUEL MICHAEL JOYNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shawn Rhoades v. Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC
as 21-2381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN PHILLIP RHOADES, JOSEPH FRANKLIN DENNIS, JOSHUA MARSHALL FLOYD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SAVANNAH RIVER NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS, LLC
Rhoades et al Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC
as 1:2021cv03391
Plaintiff:
Shawn Phillip Rhoades, Joseph Franklin Dennis, Joshua Marshall Floyd and others
Defendant:
Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
