Cases 11 - 20 of 332
US v. Christopher Jones
as 23-4628
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT JONES
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv19392
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10690
Plaintiff:
HERMON CHRISTOPHER SCOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09125
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ELLIOT v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02381
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT ELLIOT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Geoffrey Scott v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-2697
Petitioner:
GEOFFREY HOWARD CHRISTOPHER SCOTT
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Scott v. United States Department of Defense
as 1:2023cv01046
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT, U.S. Department of Defense and United States Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Marley v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv00495
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Marley
Defendant:
United States of America, State of West Virginia, Town of Fayetteville West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Ferris Valentine
as 23-2662
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ferris T. Valentine, also known as Christopher Scott Bush
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
