Cases 1 - 10 of 19
TATE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv16403
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER TATE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TATE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06554
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER TATE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DeVaughn v. City of Sheffield Alabama et al
as 3:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
Sebastian DeVaughn
Defendant:
City of Sheffield Alabama, Ricky Terry, Scott Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Christopher Tate
as 22-2060
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER TATE
Tate v. SNH CO Tenant LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00827
Defendant:
Matthew K Storrs, SNH CO Tenant LLC a Maryland limited liability company doing business as Cedars Healthcare Center, FVE Managers, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tate and Christopher (I) Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TATE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv28909
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER TATE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tate v. Seleris et al
as 3:2019cv00161
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tate
Defendant:
Sherri Copeland, Brian Fletcher and Seleris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarrell et al v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.
as 2:2017cv01371
Plaintiff:
Jamie Jarrell , Michelle Brown , Brandy Riggs and others
Defendant:
Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Montero et al v. HomeServe USA Corp.
as 1:2016cv04559
Plaintiff:
Ryan Deofaran, Mike Doherty, Aaron Gordon and others
Defendant:
HomeServe USA Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Tate v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00835
Plaintiff:
Christopher Tate
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
