Cases 1 - 10 of 321
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (handicap)
Anthony Bittendender v. Kelly Chrysler Dodge Jeep, et al
as 24-1569
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BITTENDENDER
Defendant:
KELLY CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP and KELLY IMPORTS INC
Mike Pop v. Brookfield Chrysler Dodge Jeep, Inc., et al
as 24-1201
Plaintiff:
MIKE POP
Defendant:
BROOKFIELD CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP, INC., a Michigan Corporation, GREGORY GUNTHER, ANDREW BEAM and others
Wesco v. Chrysler Capital et al
as 3:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
Monterio J Wesco
Defendant:
Chrysler Capital and Eli Weingarden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ritter v. Rick Hendrick Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram Duluth et al
as 1:2023cv05641
Plaintiff:
Rasheed S. Ritter
Defendant:
Rick Hendrick Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram Duluth, Hendrick Automotive Group and Route One
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Pop v. Brookfield Chrysler Dodge Jeep, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01196
Plaintiff:
Mike Pop
Defendant:
Brookfield Chrysler Dodge Jeep, Inc., Andrew Beam, Austin Froberg and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
