Cases 21 - 30 of 136
Davenport v. SLS et al
as 2:2017cv02225
Plaintiff:
Robert B Davenport
Defendant:
SLS and Citi Mortgage Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Jacobsen, et al v. Citi Mortgage Inc, et al
as 17-2314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JACOBSEN and CAROL JACOBSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CITI MORTGAGE INC, (NJ), CITI INC, (NJ), CITI MORTGAGE, (NJ) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01018
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
JACOBSEN et al v. CITI MORTGAGE INC. et al
as 3:2017cv01555
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. JACOBSEN and CAROL JACOBSEN
Defendant:
CITI MORTGAGE INC. (NJ), CITI INC (NJ), CITI MORTGAGE (NJ) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
YELLEN et al v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2016cv02467
Plaintiff:
MIKE YELLEN, JOSE R. SERVIDA, JAMES FRANCO and others
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., PENNYMAC CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Griffith v. Citi Mortgage Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06042
Defendant:
Citi Bank, NA and Citi Mortgage Inc.
Plaintiff:
Linda Griffith
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1324 Aliens: Complaint for Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00851
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Negron v. CITI MORTGAGE INC.
as 0:2016cv61776
Plaintiff:
William Negron
Defendant:
CITI MORTGAGE INC. and SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elliott et al v. National City Mortgage Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04039
Plaintiff:
Vicki Elliott and Donald Elliott
Defendant:
National City Mortgage Inc. and MBank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
RA v. CITI MORTGAGE, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01449
Plaintiff:
KALI RA
Defendant:
CITI MORTGAGE, INC. and PHELAN HALLINAN DIAMOND & JONES, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
