Cases 1 - 10 of 23
(HC) Allen v. Samuels, et al.
as 1:2023cv00503
Petitioner:
Clarence Allen
Respondent:
D. Samuels, California State Prison and the Attorney General of the State of California and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clarence Allen v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 18-12732
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE ALLEN
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Securian Life Insurance Company v. Ramsey et al
as 1:2017cv00353
Plaintiff:
Securian Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Esther M. Ramsey, Kristina R. Allen, Clarence Allen, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
In re: Clarence Allen
as 17-10729
Petitioner:
In re: CLARENCE ALLEN
Mandamus Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ALLEN v. JONES
as 3:2015cv00868
Petitioner:
Clarence Allen
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALLEN v. JONES
as 5:2015cv00083
Petitioner:
CLARENCE ALLEN
Respondent:
JULIE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY et al
as 7:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY
Claimant:
CLARENCE ALLEN EDMONDSON
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EDMONDSON
as 7:2013mc00008
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
CLARENCE ALLEN EDMONDSON
Clarence Allen v. Charlie Beck et al
as 2:2012cv09892
Plaintiff:
Clarence Allen
Defendant:
Charlie Beck, City of Los Angeles, Does and others
Gray et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv07251
Plaintiff:
Ora Kay Gray and Clarence Allen Gray
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
