Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Von Germeten v. Racine County Circuit Court et al
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Dean Von Germeten and Dean Richard Von Germeten
Defendant:
Racine County Circuit Court, Office of Corporation Counsel Windsor Court LLC, Michael J Piontek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00116
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Yourman v. Meyers et al
as 1:2020cv00778
Defendant:
MeyersUSA, Agern Restaurant, Grain Bar and others
Plaintiff:
Zev Yourman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. WILLIAMS et al
as 2:2017cv03314
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
SETH WILLIAMS, CAPE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER "THE BOSS, DAVID SAMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. May et al
as 4:2016cv04254
Plaintiff:
Delrico J Nelson
Defendant:
Lindsey May, J. Rhodes, S. Butterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace Jones v. State of Louisiana, et al
as 16-30909
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALLACE JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, on behalf of Department of Children & Family Services, CHERYL BETHEA, incorrectly referred to as Michelle Bethea, MICHELLE BREAUX and others
Jones v. Louisiana et al
as 6:2015cv01816
Plaintiff:
Wallace Jones
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Michelle Bethea, Michelle Breaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00670
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE OPENED/TRANSFERRED
as 2:2014cv00141
Plaintiff:
Philip Anderson , Ted Clausing , Pete Lopushinsky and others
Defendant:
Ted Strong and Rick Watlamet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
