Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Clemens v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Charles Clemens
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Mason v. James Allred
as 7:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Defendant:
Preston Smith, Bill Clements, FNU Clemens and others
Respondent:
James Allred and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, R. Polk, Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemens v. FCI Butner - 2
as 5:2023ct03360
Plaintiff:
Charles Clemens
Defendant:
FCI Butner - 2, L.B. Kelly, Ms. Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Berlin Brown v. G. Clemens, et al
as 23-3213
Plaintiff:
BERLIN VANARDO BROWN
Defendant:
CCPM CLEMENS, PREA Coordinator SCI-Camp Hill
CLEMENS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv04595
Plaintiff:
CHARLES CLEMENS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pointer v. Lay et al
as 1:2023cv01803
Plaintiff:
Callie Adalyn Pointer
Defendant:
David Allen Lay, Kirby Scott Clemens and Mason Birkbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albright v. Holliday Unit et al
as 3:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Albright
Defendant:
Clemens Unit, TDCJ, UTMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pointer v. Lay et al
as 2:2023cv02854
Plaintiff:
Callie Adalyn Pointer
Defendant:
David Allen Lay, Kirby Scott Clemens and Mason Birkbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albright v. Holiday Unit et al
as 1:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Albright
Defendant:
Holiday Unit, Clemens Unit and TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
