Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Perales Jr. v. Nababi et al
as 2:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Rene Perales Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Nababi, Kelly Johnson, K. Davies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Makupson v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jamie Anthony Makupson
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Glenn Jacobs, Chief Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Springer v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Levi G. Springer
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Chadwick Dotson, Director of Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCray v. Clevenger
as 4:2023cv04216
Plaintiff:
Leonardo McCray
Defendant:
J Clevenger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harrison v. Smith et al
as 0:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Defendant:
Fairrel D. Smith, John D. Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clevenger v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv02010
Plaintiff:
JuilieAnne M Clevenger
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rouser v. Covello et al
as 2:2022cv01749
Plaintiff:
William Rouser
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, B. Holmes, K. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Israel v. Newsome et al
as 2:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Akiva Avikaida Israel
Defendant:
Gavin C. Newsome, Kathleen Allison, Howard Moseley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Clevenger et al
as 4:2021cv04045
Defendant:
. Pennock, . Clevenger, . Kirk and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clevenger v. Macon County Jail et al
as 2:2020cv02278
Defendant:
Decatur Public Building Commission and Macon County Jail
Plaintiff:
Laurence Clevenger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
