Cases 21 - 30 of 1,064
Fantel, Jr. v. Town of South Kingstown et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of South Kingstown, South Kingstown Police Department, United States Post Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rebeca Aplonia Gross et al v. Susanne S. Cho et al
as 5:2023cv02637
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Apolonia Gross, Z. T. B. and L. R. R. W.
Defendant:
Susanne S. Cho, Natalie M.P. Lough, Elizabth E. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King Jefferson v. Bank of America NA, et al
as 24-1039
Plaintiff:
KING CLIFFORD JEFFERSON
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA NA, GRACE JACKSON and JEFFREY MANNING, Judge
King Jefferson v. City of New Brunswick, et al
as 24-1061
Plaintiff:
KING CLIFFORD JEFFERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH VITAL STATISTIC REGISTRY
Grant et al v. Knapp et al
as 2:2023cv06838
Plaintiff:
Trudy B Grant, Sarah Krawcheck, Nashonda Hunter and others
Defendant:
Howard Knapp, John Wells, JoAnne Day and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Parker v. Hutnak, et al
as 23-2006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
In Re: Parker
as 23-2005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER, acting as guardian on behalf of R.P.
Respondent / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
Frost, Jr. v. Nessel
as 1:2023cv01226
Plaintiff:
Clifford James Frost, Jr and Clifford James Frost, Jr.
Defendant:
Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
