Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Chiles et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01238
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Jerome Chiles, Dennis Joseph Cardoza, Benjamin Franklin Carey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Chiles et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00285
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Jerome Chiles, Dennis Joseph Cardoza, Benjamin Franklin Carey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv69504
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD EUGENE CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv31521
Plaintiff:
Dana Clark and Clifford E. Clark
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCoy-Piper et al v. Boyce et al
as 1:2013cv02394
Plaintiff:
Calisha McCoy-Piper and Tavius Goudeau
Defendant:
Town of Boyce, Daniel Ranburger, Kyle McCain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Dolgencorp L L C et al
as 1:2013cv02336
Plaintiff:
Clifford Wayne Clark, Jr
Defendant:
Dolgencorp L L C and Gienell Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clark v. U.S. Postal Service
as 3:2009cv01537
Plaintiff:
Clifford A. Clark
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Clifford Douglas Clark v. 3m, ., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-74292
Plaintiff:
Clifford Douglas Clark
Defendant:
3m
CLARK v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv74292
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD DOUGLAS CLARK
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
