Cases 1 - 7 of 7
DAVIS v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03639
Plaintiff:
CLYDE DAVIS
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. f/k/a JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA INC. f/k/a ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., JANSSEN ORTHO LLC, JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC f/k/a JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LLC and others
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sheldon Lockett, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 20-55936
Defendant / Appellee:
MIZRAIN ORREGO, a Deputy Los Angeles County Sheriff, SAMUEL ALDAMA, a Deputy Los Angeles County Sheriff, JIM MCDONNELL, Sheriff and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHELDON LOCKETT
Defendant:
DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE DAVIS and CLYDE DAVIS
Sheldon Lockett et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 2:2018cv05838
Defendant:
Mizrain Orrego, Sheriff Jim McDonnell, Samuel Aldama and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Davis, Clyde Davis and Sheldon Lockett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. Davis et al
as 2:2018cv10160
Plaintiff:
Asplundh Tree Expert Co.
Defendant:
Energy Group, Inc. and Clyde Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2013cv02636
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Clyde Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv05486
Plaintiff:
Joyce F. Davis and Clyde Davis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVIS, ET AL. v. 3M, ET AL.
as 2:2008cv75832
Plaintiff:
CLYDE DAVIS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
