Cases 1 - 10 of 100
COFFIN v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv07172
Plaintiff:
JAMES COFFIN
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Westerman v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv00704
Plaintiff:
James Westerman
Defendant:
Werner Enterprises, Inc. and Larry Coffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv Removal- Motor Vehicle
Andrew Isaacs v. Christopher Wigand, et al
as 26-12989
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ISAACS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER B. WIGAND, JAMES UTHMEIR, SAILY REGUEIRO and others
Speed v. Coffin et al
as 6:2026cv01815
Plaintiff:
Ryan Speed
Defendant:
Director Ann Coffin and DOR CSP Doe Officials 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv30135
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Valsaint v. Uthmeier et al
as 1:2026cv25612
Plaintiff:
Alberonick Valsaint
Defendant:
James W. Uthmeier, Katherine Fernandez-Rundle, James Zingale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan v. Coffin et al
as 0:2026cv62244
Plaintiff:
Max Morgan
Defendant:
Ann Coffin, Sharon Keri, Eureka Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chang v. Burns-Coffin Ins. and Financial Services, Inc.
as 2:2026cv02546
Plaintiff:
Calvin Chang
Defendant:
Jared Burns-Coffin Insurance and Financial Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Leszczynski v. DeHaan et al
as 2:2026cv01111
Plaintiff:
Jacob Ozark Leszczynski
Defendant:
Suzanne DeHaan, S Harter, Latia Coffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
