Cases 21 - 30 of 142
JENKINS v. LUCAS THOMAS BARTONE et al
as 1:2023cv02793
Plaintiff:
GARY V. JENKINS
Defendant:
LUCAS THOMAS BARTONE, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF RHODE ISLAND, CVS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JENKINS v. RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2023cv02785
Plaintiff:
GARY V. JENKINS
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL, PROVIDENCE FIRE DEPARTMENT, BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF RHODE ISLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Educational Amendments
MAGGITTI v. HON. BRET M. BINDER et al
as 2:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HON. BRET M. BINDER, HON. ANTHONY T. VERWEY, HON. WILLIAM P. MAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15515
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Montgomery v. Cohn, et al
as 23-1101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM MONTGOMERY
Defendant / Appellee:
BRETT COHN and TREVOR CUAZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Violation of Americans with Disabilities Act
Royal v. Gill Bright et al
as 8:2022cv01490
Plaintiff:
Theresa D. Royal
Defendant:
Judge Robin D. Gill Bright, Attorney Edward S. Cohn, CSMB Investments, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Clifford v. Walker et al
as 4:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
James E Clifford
Defendant:
Carla Walker and Jonathan R Cohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Cohn et al
as 1:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
William Montgomery
Defendant:
Brett Cohn and Trevor Cuaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
