Cases 1 - 10 of 1,152
Peters v. Apel et al
as 2:2024cv11296
Plaintiff:
Julie Elizabeth Peters
Defendant:
Colby Apel and Rokstad Power Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hale-El (PS) v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv00726
Plaintiff:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Defendant:
Ramirez, Kramer and Mora
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Torkelsen v. Braun
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Steven A. Torkelsen
Defendant:
Colby Braun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williamson v. State of North Dakota et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Robert Williamson
Defendant:
State of North Dakota, Chad Pringle, Dave Krabbenhoft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Serpik v. Weedon, et al
as 24-6071
Plaintiff:
ROMAN VLADIMIROVICH SERPIK, Article III man
Defendant:
JILL WEEDON, individually and in her official capacity, GINA WEBB, individually and in her official capacity, ANGELA C. MARSEE, individually and in her official capacity and others
Hale-El (PS) v. Florres
as 1:2024cv01017
Petitioner:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Respondent:
Ryan Florres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hale-El (PS) v. Husley et al
as 1:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Defendant:
Husley, Hunsberger, Ryan Florres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale-El (PS) v. Florres et al
as 1:2024cv00487
Petitioner:
Colby Jerome Hale-El
Respondent:
Ryan Florres and Philip Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
