Cases 1 - 10 of 391
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. Takela Jackson, et al
as 24-11267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant:
TAKELA JACKSON, RABIH TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Tracy Sanders, et al v. Reid Forrester, et al
as 24-1699
Plaintiff:
Tracy L. Sanders and David Lee Sanders
Defendant:
Reid K. Forrester, in his individual capacity, Shalonn K. Curls, in her individual capacity, Rodney J. Campbell, in his individual capacity and others
C. Holmes v. Anne Milgram
as 24-1231
Plaintiff:
C. HOLMES, a/k/a C. Holmes, a/k/a Cynthia Holmes, a/k/a Cynthia Collie Holmes, M.D.
Defendant:
ANNE MILGRAM, Administrator of DEA
C. Holmes v. Anne Milgram
as 24-1175
Plaintiff:
C. HOLMES, a/k/a C. Holmes, a/k/a Cynthia Holmes, a/k/a Cynthia Collie Holmes, M.D.
Defendant:
ANNE MILGRAM, Administrator of DEA
Laurie Williams v. Jason Collis
as 24-1083
Plaintiff:
LAURIE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JASON COLLIS and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
THOMAS v. RICHARDSON
as 1:2023cv21011
Defendant:
CAROL RICHARDSON, WILLIAMS RICHARDSON, JOE L. BEE and others
Plaintiff:
AUDREY THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Sanders et al v. Forrester et al
as 4:2023cv00676
Plaintiff:
Tracy L. Sanders and David L. Sanders
Defendant:
Reid K. Forrester, Shalonn K. Curls, Rodney J. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMAS v. BEE et al
as 1:2023cv20337
Defendant:
YELLARD, BILL COSTOFFIN, JOE L. BEE and others
Plaintiff:
AUDREY THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
