Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Macon v. Martinez et al
as 1:2015cv05238
Plaintiff:
Shawn M. Macon
Defendant:
Martinez, Gomez, Condon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayborne v. Lancaster County et al
as 8:2015cv00144
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Clayborne, Jr.
Defendant:
Patrick F. Condon, Christopher Eickholt, Mary Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bills v. Heyns et al
as 1:2015cv11415
Plaintiff:
Rickey Bills
Defendant:
Daniel Heyns, Lewis, Condon and others
Brady et al v. Manning et al
as 4:2015cv00174
Petitioner:
Michael Brady, Jimmy Toelie, Carline Balbuena and others
Respondent:
Samuel Manning, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grant v. Condon et al
as 6:2014cv06514
Plaintiff:
Desmond Grant
Defendant:
Edward Condon, David Buchhetti, Leo Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTINEZ v. EFMAN et al
as 1:2014cv01451
Plaintiff:
SABAS MARTINEZ
Defendant:
MARTIN I. EFMAN and WILLIAM CONDON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baccus v. Condon et al
as 9:2014cv02248
Plaintiff:
John Baccus
Defendant:
Charlie M Condon, Alan Wilson, William Nettles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rojas v. Dionne, et al
as 14-1396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKY ROJAS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID DIONNE, Superintendent, Hillsborough County DOC, in his individual capacity, B. MARINEAU, Deputy Chief of Security, in his individual capacity, MARC CUSSON, Captain, in his individual capacity and others
Karin Ilene Condon v. United State
as 14-1793
Petitioner - Appellant:
Karin Ilene Condon
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
McFadden v. Annucci
as 14-1001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Reginald Ghaffar McFadden
Defendant - Appellee:
Brian Fischer, Com-Doccs, Maureen Boll, DC/C-Doccs, Mark L. Bradt, Sup. ACF and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
