Cases 1 - 10 of 100
CONNOLLY et al v. UNICREDIT BANK GMBH et al
as 1:2026cv03074
Plaintiff:
JAMES CONNOLLY, DAVID MANGANELLA, DUSTIN BAUER and others
Defendant:
UNICREDIT BANK GMBH (d/b/a HypoVereinsbank), UNICREDIT BANK AUSTRIA AG and UNICREDIT S.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
Connolly v. Lasalle et al
as 5:2026cv02220
Plaintiff:
Anna Connolly
Defendant:
Hector Lasalle, Rowan Wilson, Genine Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Connolly v. Lasalle et al
as 1:2026cv00272
Plaintiff:
Anna Connolly
Defendant:
Hector LaSalle, Rowan Wilson, Genine Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Connolly v. Lasalle et al
as 6:2026cv03598
Plaintiff:
Anna Connolly
Defendant:
Hector Lasalle, Rowan Wilson, Genine Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Connolly v. Lasalle et al
as 2:2026cv00184
Plaintiff:
Anna Connolly
Defendant:
Hector Lasalle, Rowan Wilson, Genine Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CONNOLLY v. LASALLE
as 5:2026cv00361
Plaintiff:
ANNA CONNOLLY
Defendant:
HECTOR LASALLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Connolly v. Lasalle et al
as 3:2026cv00304
Plaintiff:
Anna Connolly
Defendant:
Hector Lasalle, Rowan Wilson, Genine Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Connolly v. LaSalle, et al.
as 3:2026cv01179
Plaintiff:
Anna Connolly
Defendant:
Hector LaSalle, Rowan Wilson, Genine Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
