Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Jarvis v. Converse County et al
as 2:2023cv00211
Defendant:
Austin Wells, Converse County, Converse County Board of County Commissioners and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mostaert v. Converse County District Court et al
as 2:2023cv00056
Petitioner:
Jesse Alexander Mostaert
Respondent:
Converse County District Court and Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chandler v. Converse et al
as 1:2022cv03359
Plaintiff:
Jakale Errion Chandler
Defendant:
Converse, Crutchfield, Kebo Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frankenhauser v. Kerstein et al
as 2:2021cv00029
Defendant:
Brenda Perry, Angela Mixon, Patrick Drummond and others
Plaintiff:
Eric T Frankenhauser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McAlpin v. Clem et al
as 9:2021cv00004
Defendant:
Ronnie Perry, State of Tennessee, Dent Morriss and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Scott McAlpin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Rechcigl et al
as 2:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Dunn, Appleby, Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jarell D Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Converse v. USA
as 2:2020cv01283
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joseph Lee Converse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Frankenhauser v. McDonald et al
as 2:2020cv00032
Defendant:
G Kerstein, Esther Pilgrim, P Drummond and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Frankenhauser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Converse Police Department et al
as 5:2019cv00243
Defendant:
Converse Police Department and Bexar County Sheriff Office
Plaintiff:
Robert Dewayne Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrow v. City of Durham et al
as 5:2018ct03304
Defendant:
Thomas J. Bonfield, Chief Deputy, Clerk of Superior Court and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Durrant Farrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
